This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Well you know , religion is a hot topic . I say funding is good for all if it is not discriminatory . Everyone should get it . Yes , and what about the atheists . How would they apply since there is no religious affiliation , except denial . Should atheisim be considered a religion - the non-belief in a higher power ? How would that work ? Oh , and agnostics ? What do you all out there in cyber space think ?
I'm sure plenty of atheist-run charities receive all kinds of federal charity funds.
This is an interestingly fake story. In particular, the phony quote: "I am a religious man, therefore a moral man, and therefore you should elect me." Never said. Never uttered.
Well you know , religion is a hot topic . I say funding is good for all if it is not discriminatory . Everyone should get it . Yes , and what about the atheists . How would they apply since there is no religious affiliation , except denial . Should atheisim be considered a religion - the non-belief in a higher power ? How would that work ? Oh , and agnostics ? What do you all out there in cyber space think ?
I'm sure plenty of atheist-run charities receive all kinds of federal charity funds.
This is an interestingly fake story. In particular, the phony quote: "I am a religious man, therefore a moral man, and therefore you should elect me." Never said. Never uttered.
This "story" is pure bullsh1t.
Thank you for denyin reality ... and history.
We Christian Conservatives thank you.
The BIG contributors are un-religious.
The BIG contributors are only looking for a payback after the election.
When a religious group makes it to the status of the contributions of the BIG ontributors, they too can get their payback.
Note how well the White-Hous... office has been well funded under Mr. Bush, even though they burn money with no demonstrable benefit to the public.